Perfil de do i do郁闷的肚肚FotosBlogListasMás Herramientas Ayuda
de 

Virus Warning

Cargando...Cargando...

郁闷的肚肚

随便写写,偶尔会写点病毒清除的小文
23/11/2009

再转一篇揭露360小人行径的文章

360的狐狸尾巴终于露出来了
2009年11月21日 星期六 11:36
不久以后,我将见证  360全线产品彰显流氓本质。

留下丰富的空白给360的枪手发挥,此帖不锁帖,我就要看看360枪手的威力到底如何


1  360安全中心指出,360安全浏览器本身具备网盾的全部功能,并且提供安全“隔离模式”

驳 :

(1)从产品技术体系来看,360安全浏览器只是实现了金山网盾四层防御体系中的第一层“恶意url过滤”

(2)360安全浏览器的隔离模式仅仅当“世界第一”的url防火墙发现恶意网址之后才慢悠悠的启动,让病毒在一个号称100%安全的沙盘环境下快乐的下载盗号木马等恶意木马。

金山网盾对于用户的承诺是“发现恶意挂马的操作直接从源头禁止访问,不让挂马病毒有任何下载的激活的机会”



2 360安全中心工程师介绍,金山网盾本来是一款通过对浏览器程序注入的方式,为浏览器提供安全服务的客户端软件。但是,由于金山网盾程序质量问题,反而导致被保护的对象无法正常工作

驳: 

(1) 对付层出不穷不断进化的网页恶意代码,技术越低层,就越能够保护用户浏览器安全

(2)金山网盾经数百万热心的傲游浏览器、世界之窗浏览器,firefox、opera浏览器用户已经证实-金山网盾深入低层的技术方案是可行和相对稳定的


3 事故发生后,360安全中心已及时将金山网盾的程序错误信息通报给金山公司。金山公司的工程师也通过回复邮件确认了这些程序错误的确存在。但是,由于技术方面的原因,金山公司迟迟不能修正这个程序错误。

驳:

(1) 360提供的dump文件中显示的金山网盾模块版本号2009.11.5.485 版本,当前版本是2009.11.13.510版本、

(2) 就像360安全浏览器论坛工作人员才论坛要求用户升级到最新版本一样,金山网盾给广大用户提供了免费的自动升级功能

(3)从崩溃的模块来看 2009年11月5日金山网盾导致360安全浏览器崩溃,从2009年11月5日至200911月18日,360安全浏览器3,1beta2发布(强制阻止金山网盾加载安全功能的版本)为止,我们没有收到360安全浏览器的任何反馈

(4)在金山网盾安全团队的强力要求下,于2009年11月20日下午,我们才首次收到360浏览器的崩溃文件。并在当天下午从有限的崩溃文件中,确认问题早已经在新版本中修复

 

流氓360:用户这块蛋糕我吃定了,谁动跟谁急!<转>

引子:从3721的年代开始,业内就把3721网络实名这个垃圾软件定性为流氓。没多久,3721的始作俑者又开发了一个叫360的安全软件,榜着免费杀毒软件旗帜到处坑蒙拐骗。于是,不知道多少无知的网名被360这个所谓的“专业杀毒软件”所蒙骗!
没有技术,不要紧,俺360有的是钱做广告,有的是吹牛的本事。21世纪最缺的是什么?吹牛!只要能吹,什么就都有了!
呵呵,我就小写一个引子,客官好文呈上,请看好了
     
360大佬在江湖上叱咤风云无人可敌,如今惊闻与金山毒霸这个安全行业公认老好人打起来了,小弟实在是看不下去了,金山毒霸也算是一个比较安分的厂商了,宣传少,也少做作,今天被人踩了尾巴,没理由继续安分吧,那不就太懦弱了吗?

事件就不赘述了给俩链接自己看吧

金山:关于360浏览器阻止金山网盾正常保护用户上网安全的声
http://news.duba.net/contents/2009-11/20/9016.html

360:金山网盾重大错误致360安全浏览器异常
http://bbs.360.cn/4000002/31868083.html?recommend=1

众所周知,360的粉丝多,枪手也多。
奋战到底,金山毒霸的粉丝们,坚守阵地,顶多也就两败俱伤而已~~~

举例说明360种种流氓行为:
占用系统资源巨大

       360我不知道还装着什么用,软件主界面上的广告实在太碍眼了那么多软件厂商与你合作给的分成还不够多么?唉。罢了!所以,我把360卸载了,省点系统资源。套用卡饭的一张图片能够很好的表达你究竟吃掉了我们多少资源!


总计59644kb的内存占用

       我安装你的初衷真的是想给自己的机器减减压,没想到啊,你直接给我来个加压,你以后再出点功能我电脑直接扔掉好了,你以为自己是内存终结者呢?

默认捆绑安装360浏览器

       再说说你的安装过程吧,沧海横流尽显你流氓本色!谁想装你那破浏览器了?你凭什么默认打个勾安装浏览器啊?我就是因为一不小心下一步了结果安装了这个挨千 刀的什么安全浏览器。你既然自己的主程序里已经带有防挂马设置和这防火墙那防火墙以及主动防御等功能干嘛又画蛇添足的弄一个安全浏览器出来?对自己的防木 马能力没信心么?

安全卫士默认捆绑安装360浏览器跟流氓软件有何区别

      我索性接着说说你这浏览器有多流氓,安装过程中默认设置为系统默认浏览器,你还给别人自由么?


设置为默认浏览器,美其名曰:管理外部链接

360浏览器默认修改用户主页

好不容易快安装完了,最后又要绑架我主页?!你想干嘛!你要统一全地球?征服全宇宙么??


默认修改浏览器主页为360导航

       其实这都不算什么真正运行以后我一惊,脑海中几个大字不住的盘旋:3721工具条精神永存,流氓本色不改啊!内嵌几个看似玄妙的工具网址~~嵌入式营销万岁,免费安全软件万万岁。



看似工具,实为广告的网址啊

       今天上午看了一篇文章,让我更加深信不疑“360就是互联网上最大的流氓”这一观点!金山网盾,多么好的一个产品啊!?啊?最起码人家防挂马的同时不改你主页,不没事给你乱弹窗口让你装这个玩那个的对么?你360没经过任何人同意直接在你浏览器里加了防止人家运行的代码,你说你有多流氓吧。归根究底为什么要这样做?因为产品定位跟你的防网页木马浏览器有冲突了对不对?你恶性竞争搞的这么不隐蔽更说明你就是一流氓,大流氓!跟你有利益冲突的全拍死。

详情请参考李铁军博客:http://hi.baidu.com/litiejun/blog/item/9445530e514c17c07acbe155.html

       互联网是个公平的舞台,世界上也不是只有你一家公司在做,只要东西够好,别怕没市场,用这么下作的手段抢用户,俩字评价你:下作!你再看看你们那群枪手在人家博客里写的东西吧?素质,修养哪去了?

       好歹也是一大公司,匪气横流!你耍流氓还不算完,还得盗打一耙说人家软件出了严重漏洞?圈圈叉叉!情何以堪?粗口要怎么说出口?总之拜拜360。从此以后鸡犬相闻老死不相往来啦~~

02/08/2009

干净,清澈的声音--熊天平

这几天找出来了熊天平的第一张专辑——《爱情多恼河》.
这是我在初中时某个暑假最爱听的一张专辑.几乎是天天在听,除了睡觉,吃饭外一直戴着耳机反复的听.
今天排了一天的课程表,整个人昏昏沉沉的,似乎没有了工作的动力一样.
在临近晚饭前,突然想起了熊天平的《爱情多恼河》,于是戴上耳机又听起了这首歌.
随着歌声,仿佛又回到了初中的那个暑假,一个板登,一个小竹椅,坐在晒台阴凉处做着暑假作业,耳边是熊天平清澈,纯净的嗓音.
听着歌,疲劳感顿时被驱散了,人有了精神,哼着歌,又开始浩大的排课工程.
不知道为什么,越来越不喜欢听现在年轻歌手唱的歌了,总感觉曲子不是太吵就是太过于平静,没有华丽的曲风,没有华美的歌词.
以前的情歌听着总是能让人沉醉于其中,一首轻快的情歌,让人仿佛置身于一场属于自己的甜美恋爱中.一首悲伤的情感,可以让自己听着也随着乐曲一起沉默,仿佛又经历了分手的那一刻.
而现在的歌,再也不能勾起这样的感觉.
喜欢以前的伍思凯,熊天平,柯以敏,顺子,陶喆,张学友,周华健等等..越发的喜欢听老歌.难道我也老了?还是我在一步步慢慢的变老?
13/06/2009

PCMAG关于绿坝盗用美国一公司软件技术的文章

引用自:http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2348705,00.asp
原文如下:

by Mark Hachman

SLIDESHOW (3)
Slideshow | All Shots
The "Green Dam" filtering software that the Chinese government is reportedly requiring for all PCs sold there contains pirated code, a U.S. software manufacturer claimed Friday.

Solid Oak Software, the developer of CyberSitter, claims that the look and feel of the GUI used by Green Dam mimics the style of CyberSitter. But more damning, chief executive Brian Milburn said, was the fact that the Green Dam code uses DLLs identified with the CyberSitter name, and even makes calls back to Solid Oak's servers for updates.

Green Dam is a piece of filtering software that will reportedly be required for all PCs sold inside China. The software is already available in China, although the restrictions go into place on July 1, according to The New York Times.

According to a study by the University of Michigan, the Green Dam software works to identify images, text, and URLs and compares them to a filter, which blocks the offending work. The researchers took the publicly available software and reverse-engineered it, using standard methods. Inside, the study's author, assistant professor of electrical engineering J. Alex Halderman, found evidence that the software uses blacklists compiled by CyberSitter, dating back to 2006. An encrypted news bulletin, which dates back to 2004, was also accidentally included, Halderman wrote.

"We've been talking with them since the report came out yesterday," Halderman said in an interview.

To Halderman, the Green Dam software presents two fundamental problems: one, that the software contains vulnerabilities that would allow others to spy on the activities of those who use it; and second, that it might contain code stolen from another manufacturer. The Chinese developer of the Green Dam software appears to have accidentally created the vulnerabilities, Halderman said, rather than being a deliberate attempt to allow government agencies to monitor its citizens online.

"If we apply reasoning to this, we would conclude that the government wants a backdoor it could access, and others could not," Halderman said.

Version 3.17 of the Green Dam software appears to contain both the references to the blacklists as well as the allegedly stolen code. But the software is also being frequently updated, and the most recent patch, applied Thursday, appears to eliminate many of the blacklist references to Solid Oak, Halderman said.

"I think the bottom line is that the Chinese government is trying to roll out the software without doing their due diligence," Halderman said. "Clearly, there needs to be more time to evaluate the software both in terms of legality and in terms of security before it is rolled out on a widespread basis."

That was small consolation to Solid Oak's Milburn, who said that he had received an anonymous email sent to a broadcast address at the site Friday morning alerting the company that Green Dam was using Solid Oak code. He dismissed it, thinking it was a hoax. But another employee researched it and found that the allegation was indeed true, and that both URLs and other Solid Oak code, including DLL files, were part of Green Dam. After doing a bit of research he found the U. of Michigan paper and contacted Halderman.

"From the stuff they've posted, I'm 100 percent certain they're using our proprietary code," Milburn said, who said he wasn't certain how much of the code was reverse-engineered or simply stolen.

"We're still trying to do the detective work here," Milburn said.

At press time, Solid Oak had determined that the filtering engine or parts of it on lower level had been decompiled, using certain proprietary methods. Solid Oak doesn't ship a Chinese-language version of CyberSitter. But, Milburn said, "the words a user sees on the screen are almost identical to ours."

According to Milburn, the company spent Friday trying to determine what its options were, and what avenues it could pursue to try and prevent its code from being misused.

According to The New York Times, PC OEMs were blindsided by the Green Dam requirement, and have tried to figure out how they could add the software to their production lines just six weeks before the mandate was scheduled to take place. Dell, Hewlett-Packard, and other OEMs would be required to add the software to their PC distributions.

But would they if it contributed to software piracy? "To my mind, [shipping Green Dam] would make the PC manufacturers an accessory after the fact to software piracy," Milburn said. "I would think that the PC manufacturers wouldn't want to do that if I were in their position."

"We haven't had any opportunity to explore our options," Milburn said. "At the very minimum, I believe we would pursue some sort of injunction."

Theoretically, this could place PC OEMs wishing to do business in China with a nearly impossible choice: face the threat of an injunction or suits within the United States, risk angering the Chinese government by removing the Green Dam software, or halt PC sales into China altogether. Representatives at Hewlett-Packard and Dell were unable to be reached for comment by press time.

This isn't the first time Solid Oak's code has been stolen, Milburn said. In the late 1990s, hackers reverse-engineered CyberSitter, which prevents underage children from accessing pornography or other adult content, to allow users to access such content.

The hackers, as well as other detractors, have previously accused Solid Oak and CyberSitter of censoring the Internet. "That's why we don't want to be associated with it," Milburn said of Green Dam.

Moreover, potentially millions of Chinese PC users could hit Solid Oak's servers for updates, causing them huge fees for the additional bandwidth costs the company would be charged for.

One obvious solution to the problem would be to block access to China, a move that would also cut off a number of American schools in China, including missionary schools, that use the software as a legitimate means of preventing children from accessing the adult content. Some organizations with satellite offices in Singapore, Korea, or other South Asian countries might also be affected.

"They're using it legitimately, and we don't want to turn off the entire continent," Milburn said.

 
Foto 1 de 1